Showing posts with label sea. Show all posts

 



Even as awareness around plastic pollution grows, very little is being done to solve the problem. At this rate, by 2050, some experts predict the world's oceans will contain more plastic than fish.

A think piece from the United Nations, commissioned by the G20, has now detailed everything the world should do to stop that from becoming our reality because we're not doing enough.

Today, roughly 11 million tonnes of plastic end up in our oceans each year, and according to a 2020 model from SYSTEMIQ and The Pew Trusts, by 2040, the amount of plastic waste that leaks into our oceans could nearly triple.

Meanwhile, promises and policies from governments and companies will only reduce plastic litter in the marine environment by 7 percent.

That's nowhere near what will be needed to achieve the G20's Osaka Blue Ocean Vision, which seeks to stop any new plastic pollution from entering the oceans by 2050.

To get there, researchers at the UN argue the world needs a "wholesale change in the plastics economy". We need the plastics industry to go from a "linear and wasteful system" to a circular and renewable one in just a few decades.

According to the report, that's a lofty goal, but it's the only way to achieve the Osaka Blue Ocean Vision. If the G20 is really serious about its commitments, then leading nations need to make plastic pollution a bigger priority going forward.

The report is largely reliant upon a model published in 2020. It shows that if the world does decide to take ambitious and urgent action on plastic pollution, we can reduce the litter destined for our oceans by 82 percent come 2040 using known technology and approaches.

That will, of course, require nations from all around the world to act in unison, something we haven't been great at so far. But if we can figure out the best route to get there, we could create a road map for all to follow.

"It's time to stop isolated changes where you have country after country doing random things that on the face of it are good but actually don't make any difference at all," says Steve Fletcher from the University of Portsmouth. 

"Intentions are good but don't recognize that changing one part of the system in isolation doesn't magically change everything else."

Recycling alone won't be enough. The 2020 model found at least half a million people will need to be connected to waste collection services every day for that to work as a strategy. 

"Given this is unlikely, reducing the amount of plastic in the system should be a top priority for policymakers because waste management systems cannot scale quickly enough," the report argues.

"The use of plastic can be reduced, minimized, or avoided entirely in many circumstances through intentional design changes to a product."

Global packaging, the authors point out, is valued between $80-120 billion USD per year, yet 95 percent of that money is lost as plastic waste. Not only could changing the design save companies money, but there are also economic benefits that come from developing new products which rely less on plastic and more on renewable materials.

Ocean clean-up efforts will also be necessary to pick up at least part of what we have already tossed away, including the enormous Pacific garbage patch and other similar accumulations of plastic.

But preventing further leakage should be our number one priority, researchers say. Cleaning up plastic in the ocean comes with a lot of challenges, requires advanced technology, and costs a lot of money.

As such, ocean clean-ups should only be considered a "useful transitional effort" on our way to a circular plastics economy. Otherwise, we'll just keep giving ourselves more and more garbage to chip away at.

In a time of global economic recovery, when COVID-19 stimulus packages emphasize green growth like never before, the world has an opportunity to address the plastics economy like never before.

If these stimulus packages can include measures to reduce marine plastic and create greener sectors from nation to nation, we might just make the Osaka Blue Ocean Vision come true after all.

The UN International Resource Panel report is available here.



More than 100,000 years ago, a period of unusually warm sea surface temperatures saw the oceans rise up to 9 metres higher than they are today.

The bad news? We might be looking at the same thing happening again, after researchers discovered that the heat extremes of that ancient, natural phase of global warming were actually similar to the temperature trends we're seeing today.
A new analysis led by researchers from Oregon State University has found that sea surface temperatures (SST) during the last interglacial period (LIG) – also called the Eemian – bear a striking resemblance to the rise in SSTs that have taken place over the last 150 years or so.
The LIG occurred between 129,000 and 116,000 years ago, and was one of the warmest periods of the last 800,000 years.
During the interglaciation, Earth's climate warmed due to a shift in the tilt of the planet, causing sea levels to rise between 6 and 9 metres higher than they are at present.
Now, after analysing marine sediment cores from 83 sites around the world, the researchers have reconstructed global sea surface temperatures during the LIG, and matched it with temperature data sets covering the years 1870–1889 and 1995–2014.
At the outset of the LIG, some 129,000 years ago, the global sea surface temperature was already similar to the average sea surface temperature for the 1870–1889 period.
Temperatures warmed very slowly during the LIG, with the global sea surface temperature increasing by about 0.5°C by 125,000 years ago.
But while that change occurred slowly over 4 millennia during the LIG, the 1995–2014 average shows the sea surface is at the same temperature now – and the rise took less than 150 years this time around.
"The result that present global sea surface temperatures are indistinguishable from those at the last interglacial 125,000 years ago is extremely worrying, since sea levels were 6 to 9 metres higher then compared to present," says climate scientist Richard Allan from the University of Reading in the UK, who was not involved with the study.
Even though the sea surface temperature now is about the same as it was 125,000 years ago, there's still a lot we don't know about how sea levels will rise this time, since the time-scale over which these temperature increases took place – and are still taking place – is so different.
During the LIG, the warming occurred so slowly that sea ice melting would have been a gradual, drawn out process. This time around – with a much faster increase in sea surface temperatures due to human activity – it's unclear how long the effect will take.
"[D]ue to the length of time it takes to heat up the depths of our vast oceans and to melt giant ice sheets it would take thousands of years before sea level could potentially rise to such levels," says Allan.
"[S]o sustained and substantive cuts in greenhouse gas emissions from energy-intensive activities remain vital and beneficial to societies."
While current global efforts are aiming to rein in carbon and keep global warming temperature increases to less than 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, it's not great news that – as it stands – human intervention can speed up natural global warming processes to such a worrisome extent.
"It's not just the warming, it's the release of carbon from reservoirs [of fossil fuels] in the planet that have been around for millions of years," lead researcher Jeremy Hoffman told Ian Johnston at The Independent.
"We're talking about something that took millions of years to form and we're removing it in decades. Earth would need to have an eruption like Mount St Helen's happen every 2.5 hours … to keep pace with the emissions we are producing."
Despite the sober outlook the research provides, scientists say we need to use this knowledge and act while we can, to mitigate the impact on generations in many centuries from now.
"Sea level responds directly to global temperatures, but slowly, so that the full extent of sea level rise will only be apparent over thousands of years," researcher Andrew Watson from the University of Exeter in the UK, who wasn't involved with the study, said in a statement.

"The good news is that with luck it will continue to rise slowly, so that we have time to adapt, but the bad news is that eventually all our present coastal city locations will be inundated."

colossal-sea-monster
Scientists at the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa and their colleagues from the Auckland University of Technology performed a dissection of an extremely well-persevered dead colossal squid on camera yesterday, cutting into select parts, including its beak and mantle.
In December 2013, fishermen near Antarctica caught something that's almost never seen by humans: a colossal squid. It was only the second intact adult ever caught — the species typically lurks thousands of feet underwater.
And by colossal squid, they do mean colossal. Eyes as big as dinner plates. Tentacles as thick as fire hoses. The squid was 11 feet long and weighed some 770 pounds. It had to be carted around by forklift. (This isn't the same as a giant squid — see below.)
Then the squid sat in cold storage for eight months — until yesterday, when a team of scientists in New Zealand thawed the squid out and dissected it on live camera. You can watch the whole thing on video given below
via - theverge source - vox

They say stranger things happen at sea, but it seems stranger things happen on beaches, too.Billions of mysterious small creatures have been washed up on beaches along the west coast of the U.S, from Southern California to British Columbia.The jellyfish-like creatures are known as 'by-the-wind sailors' or Velella velella and have stunned scientists as they are rarely seen.


David Bader, director of education at the Aquarium of the Pacific in Long Beach, California, told New York Daily News that the organisms were brought to the West Coast by a shift in the currents and winds.By-the-wind sailors float on the sea's surface and have a fin that acts as a sail so they can be transported by the wind.
watch this video
Bader added that the unique creatures are actually "colonial organisms". They are not one main animal, but a colony of small animals that live together.Velella velella do sting but are too weak to harm humans.!
source - aol
Powered by Blogger.